Edit: wow, this is a never ending comment section!

  • capital
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 months ago

    Ubuntu Server with docker/docker-compose on top.

    So many guides for Ubuntu specifically makes reading up on something a lot easier and it works just fine.

  • @rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    Three HP ProLiant servers running ProxMox cluster. Each box has a VM for Portaiber, as well as mismatch of VMs running Home Assistant OS, OpenWRT, Ubuntu, Windows and Debian, along with a Windows file server that connectes to four cheap NAS running Ubuntu LTS with a combined 20 mismatched hard drives by iSCSI and borgs them together with Storage Spaces.

    It’s a fucking mess, if I’m honest.

    • PHLAK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      I am super impressed with Arch on my home servers. People seem to think “rolling” means “unstable” but the only issues I’ve had were due to some weird hardware incompatibility with my motherboard. Once I replaced the mobo my system has been rock solid AND reasonably up-to-date (I do use LTS kernel).

      • @Molecular0079@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        I felt the exact same way. So many comments online told me that running Arch as a home NAS was insane, but after the Jupiter Broadcasting guys did it without much issue, I decided to give it a go and was pleasantly surprised. I think if most of your stuff is running in Docker and you have BTRFS snapshots for your root filesystem, the system’s pretty much bullet proof. The rolling updates also mean you’ll never have huge upgrade cycles that are a pain in the ass to migrate to. You’re always just dealing with small manageable fires instead of large complicated ones and that’s a plus.

  • @alansuspect@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 months ago

    Just to be controversial, macos. It’s nothing fancy, just the arrs and Jellyfin running on an old MacBook air.

  • april
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 months ago

    I’m running FreeBSD I actually like it a lot.

    I picked it for zfs. A lot of the ways things work seem cleaner and simpler than on Linux and zfs is awesome with the copy on write snapshots and filesystem compression and all that. I like rc.conf and pf is way nicer than iptables and even when you upgrade it automatically makes a snapshot so you can rollback.

    Sometimes I do need to patch and compile things because people seem to not know freebsd exists but that’s really the only downside.

    • @legios@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Same here for the same reasons (although I started with FreeBSD 4.x) and have adapted to ZFS and Jails over the years.

      The POLA (Principle Of Least Astonishment) when it comes to changes is awesome too.

  • @HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 months ago

    Debian. It is rock solid. If software doesn’t support Debian, chances are it supports something Debian based. You never have to worry about an update breaking your computer. It is the perfect “it just works” distro for a server.